-
Fertility and Sterility May 2022
Topics: Female; Fertility; Humans; Ovariectomy
PubMed: 35351293
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.023 -
Maturitas Nov 2022To study the trajectories of metabolic parameters after bilateral oophorectomy.
OBJECTIVE
To study the trajectories of metabolic parameters after bilateral oophorectomy.
STUDY DESIGN
This population-based cohort study included a random sample of all premenopausal women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy at or before age 45 years from 1988 to 2007 in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and their age-matched (±1 year) referent women who did not undergo bilateral oophorectomy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The medical records of all women were reviewed to collect the metabolic parameters over a 10-year period. We compared three groups of women: 1) referent women (n = 270), 2) women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy and received estrogen therapy (n = 163), and 3) women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy and did not receive estrogen therapy (n = 107).
RESULTS
Over 10 years of follow-up, the three groups had significantly different mean values of diastolic blood pressure, weight, body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). However, women with and without bilateral oophorectomy were already different at baseline for hyperlipidemia, systolic blood pressure, weight, and BMI. Nevertheless, the trajectories of change over 10 years were significant for weight (group by time interaction p = 0.03), BMI (p = 0.03), and HDL-C (p = 0.004). The changes occurred primarily in the initial 4-5 years. Women who received estrogen therapy after bilateral oophorectomy were comparable to the referent women with respect to the weight and BMI trends, and they experienced an increase in HDL-C over time.
CONCLUSION
Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before menopause experienced unfavorable changes in some metabolic parameters possibly increasing their cardiovascular risk.
Topics: Age Factors; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Estrogens; Female; Humans; Lipoproteins, HDL; Ovariectomy; Risk Factors; Triglycerides
PubMed: 35905571
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.07.005 -
Clinical Journal of the American... Nov 2018Premenopausal women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Given the potential benefits of estrogen on kidney function, we...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Premenopausal women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Given the potential benefits of estrogen on kidney function, we hypothesized that women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy are at higher risk of CKD.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS
We performed a population-based cohort study of 1653 women residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before age 50 years old and before the onset of menopause from 1988 to 2007. These women were matched by age (±1 year) to 1653 referent women who did not undergo oophorectomy. Women were followed over a median of 14 years to assess the incidence of CKD. CKD was primarily defined using eGFR (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m on two occasions >90 days apart). Hazard ratios were derived using Cox proportional hazards models, and absolute risk increases were derived using Kaplan-Meier curves at 20 years. All analyses were adjusted for 17 chronic conditions present at index date, race, education, body mass index, smoking, age, and calendar year.
RESULTS
Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy had a higher risk of eGFR-based CKD (211 events for oophorectomy and 131 for referent women; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.77; absolute risk increase, 6.6%). The risk was higher in women who underwent oophorectomy at age ≤45 years old (110 events for oophorectomy and 60 for referent women; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 2.19; absolute risk increase, 7.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
Premenopausal women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy, particularly those ≤45 years old, are at higher risk of developing CKD, even after adjusting for multiple chronic conditions and other possible confounders present at index date.
PODCAST
This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2018_10_11_CJASNPodcast_18_1.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Middle Aged; Minnesota; Ovariectomy; Premenopause; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30232136
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03990318 -
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology May 2014Current evidence suggests that estrogen may have beneficial, neutral, or detrimental effects on the brain depending on age, type of menopause (natural versus induced),... (Review)
Review
Current evidence suggests that estrogen may have beneficial, neutral, or detrimental effects on the brain depending on age, type of menopause (natural versus induced), or stage of menopause (early versus late), consistent with the timing hypothesis. Three studies have now compared women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before menopause with referent women and consistently showed an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. These studies suggest a sizeable neuroprotective effect of estrogen naturally produced by the ovaries before age 50 years. In this article, we focus on neuroprotection as related to cognitive decline and dementia. Several case-control studies and cohort studies also showed neuroprotective effects in women who received estrogen treatment (ET) in the early postmenopausal stage (most commonly at ages 50-60 years). The majority of women in those observational studies had undergone natural menopause and were treated for the relief of menopausal symptoms. However, the clinical trials by the Women's Health Initiative showed that women who initiated ET alone or in combination with a progestin in the late postmenopausal stage (ages 65-79 years) experienced an increased risk of dementia and cognitive decline regardless of the type of menopause. Three observational studies have now formally tested the timing hypothesis, and showed that the neuroprotective or harmful effects of estrogen depend on age at the time of initiation of treatment and on stage of menopause. Therefore, women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy before the onset of menopause or women who experience premature or early natural menopause should be considered for hormonal treatment until the average age of natural menopause (around age 50 years). Recommendations for the use of ET by women who experience natural menopause at typical ages remain less certain, and more research is needed.
Topics: Age Factors; Case-Control Studies; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Dementia; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Estrogens; Female; Humans; Menopause; Neuroprotective Agents; Observational Studies as Topic; Ovariectomy; Risk; Women's Health
PubMed: 24508665
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.01.020 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Apr 2022Hysterectomy is one of the most frequent gynecologic surgeries in the United States. Women undergoing hysterectomy are commonly offered bilateral oophorectomy for...
BACKGROUND
Hysterectomy is one of the most frequent gynecologic surgeries in the United States. Women undergoing hysterectomy are commonly offered bilateral oophorectomy for ovarian and breast cancer prevention. Although bilateral oophorectomy may dramatically reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers, some studies suggested that bilateral oophorectomy may be associated with an increased risk of other types of cancer, such as lung cancer and colorectal cancer. However, the results are conflicting.
OBJECTIVE
To study the association between bilateral oophorectomy and the risk of subsequent cancer of any type.
STUDY DESIGN
This population-based cohort study included all premenopausal women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy for a nonmalignant indication before the age of 50, between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2007 in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and a random sample of age-matched (±1 year) referent women who did not undergo bilateral oophorectomy. Women with cancer before oophorectomy (or index date) or within 6 months after the index date were excluded. Time-to-event analyses were performed to assess the risk of de novo cancer. Cancer diagnosis and type were confirmed using medical record review.
RESULTS
Over a median follow-up of 18 years, the risk of any cancer did not significantly differ between the 1562 women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before natural menopause and the 1610 referent women (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.03). However, women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy had a decreased risk of gynecologic cancers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.34) but not of nongynecologic cancers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.26). In particular, the risk of breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and lung cancer did not differ between these 2 cohorts. Use of estrogen therapy through the age of 50 years in women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy did not modify the results.
CONCLUSION
Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before menopause have a reduced risk of gynecologic cancer but not of other types of cancer including breast cancer. Women at average risk of ovarian cancer should not consider bilateral oophorectomy for the prevention of breast cancer or other nongynecologic cancers.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Premenopause; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34774521
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.040 -
Stroke Oct 2022Little is known about the long-term risks of stroke and ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women who had a hysterectomy alone (HA) or with bilateral oophorectomy (HBO) for...
BACKGROUND
Little is known about the long-term risks of stroke and ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women who had a hysterectomy alone (HA) or with bilateral oophorectomy (HBO) for benign diseases, particularly in China where the burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is high. We assessed mean levels of cardiovascular risk factors and relative risks of stroke and IHD in Chinese women who had a HA or HBO.
METHODS
A total of 302 510 women, aged 30 to 79 years were enrolled in the China Kadoorie Biobank from 2004 to 2008 and followed up for a mean of 9.8 years. The analysis involved premenopausal women without prior cardiovascular disease or cancer at enrollment. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios for incident cases of CVD and their pathological types (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and IHD) after HA and HBO. Analyses were stratified by age and region and adjusted for levels of education, household income, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, self-reported health, and number of pregnancies.
RESULTS
Among 282 722 eligible women, 8478 had HA, and 1360 had HBO. Women who had HA had 9% higher risk of CVD after HA (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.12]) and 19% higher risk of CVD after HBO (1.19 [95% CI, 1.12-1.26]) compared with women who did not. Both HA and HBO were associated with higher risks of ischemic stroke and IHD but not with hemorrhagic stroke. The relative risks of CVD associated with HA and HBO were more extreme at younger age of surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Women who had either HA or HBO have higher risks of ischemic stroke and IHD, and these risks should be evaluated when discussing these interventions. Additional screening for risk factors for CVD should be considered in women following HA and HBO operations, especially if such operations are performed at younger age.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Female; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Hysterectomy; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Ischemia; Ovariectomy; Risk Factors; Stroke
PubMed: 35862220
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037305 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Apr 2023Hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy are common major surgical procedures that have been associated with increased mortality risk. We aimed to assess the association...
INTRODUCTION
Hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy are common major surgical procedures that have been associated with increased mortality risk. We aimed to assess the association of hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a Norwegian population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Cohort study with data from The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT2) linked to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, with follow-up from 1996 until 2014 or death. The unexposed group (n = 18 673) included women with both their ovaries and uterus intact, while the two exposed groups included women with hysterectomy alone (n = 1199), or bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy (n = 907). We compared mortality in exposed vs unexposed groups and adjusted for relevant covariates by Cox regression. Further, we performed analyses stratified by age at surgery (≤39, 40-52, ≥53 years) and subgroup analyses among women ≤52 years of age at inclusion.
RESULTS
Among the 47 312 women in HUNT2 (1995-1997), 20 779 provided complete information regarding gynecological surgery and previous health. The hysterectomy group had increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.58) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09-1.97). We found no significant association between bilateral oophorectomy and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in the total population. However, among women ≤52 years at inclusion, cardiovascular mortality was increased in the hysterectomy group (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.19-6.17) with a similar, but less precise estimate in the bilateral oophorectomy group (HR 2.42, 95% CI 0.84-6.93).
CONCLUSIONS
Hysterectomy was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, whereas bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was not. Among women ≤52 years at inclusion, both hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy were associated with a twofold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, but the results were imprecise. Women after hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy constitute a group with increased cardiovascular mortality that may need closer attention to cardiovascular disease risk from the healthcare system to ensure timely and effective preventive interventions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Cohort Studies; Ovariectomy; Hysterectomy; Cardiovascular Diseases
PubMed: 36814418
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14531 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2014Background Prophylactic oophorectomy alongside hysterectomy in premenopausal women is a common procedure. The decision to remove or conserve the ovaries is often based... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Background Prophylactic oophorectomy alongside hysterectomy in premenopausal women is a common procedure. The decision to remove or conserve the ovaries is often based on the perceived risk for ovarian cancer and the need for additional gynaecological surgical interventions,and is weighed against the perceived risk of negative health effects caused by surgically induced menopause. The evidence needed to recommend either prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy or conservation of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy in premenopausal women is limited. This is an update of the original version of this systematic review published in 2008.Objectives To compare hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy plus bilateral oophorectomy in women with benign gynaecological conditions,with respect to rates of mortality or subsequent gynaecological surgical interventions.Search methods We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (December 2005 to January 2014) and the following electronic databases: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2014),EMBASE (January 1985 to January 2014), and PsycINFO (1806 to January 2014).Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women with benign gynaecological conditions were eligible. Any surgical approach could be used.Data collection and analysis Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Study authors were contacted if information was unclear.Main results Only one RCT comparing the benefits and risks of hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy was identified. The results of this pilot RCT have not been published and we have not been able to obtain the results. Therefore, no data could be included in this review. Authors' conclusions The conclusions of this review are limited by a lack of RCTs. Although no evidence is available from RCTs, there is growing evidence from observational studies that surgical menopause may impact negatively on cardiovascular health and all cause mortality.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Ovariectomy; Premenopause
PubMed: 25101365
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005638.pub3 -
Journal of Epidemiology and Community... Mar 2007Removal of a woman's ovaries (known as bilateral oophorectomy, ovariectomy or, historically, ovariotomy) is undertaken in a number of countries. An estimated 19,000... (Review)
Review
Removal of a woman's ovaries (known as bilateral oophorectomy, ovariectomy or, historically, ovariotomy) is undertaken in a number of countries. An estimated 19,000 women aged <60 years had a bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in the UK in 2003, either as a planned response to an increased specific genetic risk of ovarian or breast cancer or, more frequently, as a prophylactic measure to prevent ovarian cancer. Despite its popularity, however, a full evaluation of the risks, costs and benefits of prophylactic oophorectomy in the absence of genetic markers and at the time of hysterectomy has not yet been undertaken. This paper seeks to provide a historical perspective on current practice by outlining approaches to the ovary in Britain from the 19th century onwards. Historically, ovarian removal has raised many questions about the costs and benefits of surgery. The aim of this article is to highlight the issues, and in so doing, to contribute to a more informed assessment of current practice.
Topics: Attitude of Health Personnel; Breast Neoplasms; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy
PubMed: 17325391
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.046474 -
Maturitas Oct 2014This is a narrative review of new ideas and concepts related to differences between men and women in their risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). We... (Review)
Review
This is a narrative review of new ideas and concepts related to differences between men and women in their risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). We introduce the concept of dimorphic neurology and the distinction between sex and gender. We then provide three examples of risk factors related to sex and gender from the literature. Apolipoprotein E genotype is equally common in men and women but has a stronger effect in women. Apolipoprotein E genotype is a biological factor that cannot be modified but interacts with sex or gender related factors that can be modified. Low education has a similar harmful effect in men and women but has been historically more common in women. Education is a social factor related to gender that can be modified. Finally, bilateral oophorectomy is a factor restricted to women. Bilateral oophorectomy is a surgical practice related to sex that can be modified. Consideration of risk and protective factors in men and women separately may accelerate etiologic research for neurological diseases in general, and for dementia and AD in particular. Similarly, future preventive interventions for dementia should be tailored to men and women separately.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Dementia; Educational Status; Female; Gender Identity; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Humans; Male; Ovariectomy; Risk Factors; Sex Characteristics; Sex Factors
PubMed: 24954700
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.008